Event · AD 117 · Jerusalem · Rome
Symeon and Ignatius martyred, AD 117
Martyrdom of Symeon of Jerusalem & Ignatius under Trajan
**Two deaths that close the apostolic connection and open the documentary record of the next generation.**
**Symeon son of Clopas** was the second bishop of Jerusalem, chosen after James was stoned, and — on Hegesippus’s account, preserved by Eusebius — a **cousin of the Lord**, Clopas being Joseph’s brother. He was accused as both a descendant of David and a Christian, tortured for many days, and crucified **at the age of a hundred and twenty**. Eusebius reports that the judge and the bystanders were astonished at his endurance.
**With him the family connection ends.** He is the last figure in this archive with a claimed blood tie to Jesus, and after him the Jerusalem succession passes out of the family entirely.
## Ignatius, and why he is different
Ignatius of Antioch was sent to Rome to die, and **wrote seven letters on the way** — to Ephesus, Magnesia, Tralles, Rome, Philadelphia, Smyrna and to Polycarp. The archive holds them.
**They are the most valuable body of evidence in the archive for what the church looked like in about AD 110**, precisely because they are not written to argue about it. He assumes a bishop, presbyters and deacons in each city as a matter of course; he assumes the churches will read each other’s letters; he assumes the eucharist is central. **What a man assumes while writing on the way to his death is better evidence than what he sets out to prove.**
And he asks the Romans not to intervene: he would rather die. The letter to Rome is the plainest statement of what martyrdom meant to the people who sought it, and the archive quotes it on his own record.
**A dating caution.** The traditional date is under Trajan, about AD 107–117, and Eusebius places it in his reign. **The evidence is not precise**, and some scholars argue for a considerably later date on the ground that the letters presuppose a church order slower to develop than 110 allows. Recorded; not adopted.
The sources for this event
Every source the record rests on, with what it says and what it cannot carry.
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History III.32
c. AD 325[Quoting Hegesippus: **Symeon son of Clopas**, second bishop of Jerusalem, was accused before the consular Atticus both as **of the line of David** and as a Christian; he was tortured for many days and **crucified at the age of a hundred and twenty**, and the judge and the bystanders wondered greatly at his endurance. **With him the archive’s last claimed blood tie to Jesus ends**, and the Jerusalem succession leaves the family.]
Eusebius of Caesarea, *Ecclesiastical History* — held in this library. English: A. C. McGiffert, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers 2nd series 1 (1890), public domain.
Read the source text →Ignatius of Antioch, the seven letters
c. AD 110[Seven letters written on the road to the arena — **the archive’s best evidence for what the church looked like about AD 110, precisely because none of it is argued.** He assumes bishop, presbyters and deacons in each city as a matter of course; assumes churches read one another’s letters; assumes the eucharist is central. What a man takes for granted while travelling to his death is stronger evidence than what he sets out to prove. He asks the Roman church **not to intervene** on his behalf. ⚠ **Dating caution:** the traditional placement under Trajan, c. AD 107–117, follows Eusebius; the evidence is not precise, and some scholars argue a considerably later date because the letters presuppose a church order slower to develop. Recorded, not adopted.]
The Letters of Ignatius of Antioch — held in this library. English: Ante-Nicene Fathers 1, public domain.
Read the source text →Figures in this event (4)
Scholarship
- Ignatius of Antioch: A Martyr Bishop and the Origin of EpiscopacyAllen Brent, 2007On the letters and the dating dispute.